Repo Compare › Backend-as-a-service

Supabase vs Appwrite vs PocketBase

A side-by-side look at how actively Supabase, Appwrite and PocketBase are developed on GitHub — popularity, contributor base, commit activity and how quickly issues and pull requests move.

What the numbers say

Head-to-head

Snapshot taken 30 September 2026.

MetricSupabase
Active
Appwrite
Active
PocketBase
Active
Stars111k58k61k
Forks15k5.8k3.7k
Contributors2.1k53245
Commits, last 52 weeks6.1k14k534
Open issues30034519
Open pull requests7983240
Closed / merged PRs24k7.8k345
Watchers752422326
Last push30 Sep 202630 Sep 202628 Sep 2026
Latest releasev1.26.08 (Aug 2026)2.3.0 (Sep 2026)v0.40.4 (Sep 2026)
Main languageTypeScriptPHPGo
LicenceApache-2.0BSD-3-ClauseMIT
CreatedOct 2019Apr 2019Jul 2022

Bold marks the highest value in a row. “Active / Slowing / Dormant” is a simple heuristic from how recently code was pushed and open issues per star — a starting point, not a verdict. Stars measure popularity, not quality.

Open these in the live comparer →

Related comparisons